In addition to size, the variability of the large and thick sections
of the tower that need to be welded together is another challenge. The sections
tend to be conical in shape and stack on one another to form the tower. The
cones are roll formed to a specific diameter and then welded in large sections
with the accessories, ladders, and doors added as needed. The components are
cleaned and sand blasted prior to painting and on-site assembly.
Advances in robotic welding have increased dexterity and overall process
capability. The updated control technology and welding process allows for
greater deposition rates when applied to a flexible robot cell. See Wind Tower Robotic Workcell Design. Robotic sensing
technology allows parts to be properly cut and welded, improving the cycle
time and overall throughput with less waste and improved structural integrity
because of accurate weld sizes. Installation of robots on large manipulators
enables them to reach over 6 m in height. See Robot
Welding Large Parts. Teleoperation capabilities provide control
of the welding robot without being in direct contact at the arc. New robotic
safety controls provide a tailored workspace and can safely limit a robot’s
speed when a worker is near, enabling a cooperative working area for the robot
and human.
Process of Manufacturing Wind Tower Columns
Horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWT) consist of the tower column, and
the nacelle mounted on top, which houses the generator assembly that holds
the rotor and connects to the gearbox-generator. Tower heights are approximately
twice to triple the blade length and help to balance the material costs of
the tower structure against better use of the more expensive moving parts.
(Note: If you were to double the height of a wind turbine, it would provide
about a 35% improvement in energy efficiency but would increase the material
cost more than eight times.) The tower column may mount on a concrete base
for land-based installations or on pilings if installed on the ocean floor.
Many different types of tower structures exist but most large wind turbines
are designed with tubular steel towers, which are manufactured in sections.
Tower columns are tapered to handle the excessive loads. This saves material
and makes them more aesthetically pleasing. Taller towers — approximately
80 m in height — place the rotor at an elevation that supports stable
wind speeds, and therefore produce higher output with capacities of more than
1.5 MW.
Wind tower fabrication starts out with flat plates of steel that are
rolled into sections to form a conical shape. The cone section is closed and
the joints welded on both the inside and outside. The conical sections are
joined end to end into larger sections 15 to 30 m in length with flanges at
either end so the assemblies may be shipped over the road and bolted together
on the site to form the tapered tower. The welded sections are 100% inspected
for quality, weld size, and structural integrity. Many times the welds are
shaved smooth through a grinding or milling process to further save weight
and eliminate unnecessary stress in the section elements. Based on regional
weather conditions, wind tower loads become quite variable due to unexpected
forces of nature so every countermeasure to maximize safety is critical. For
example, in the Great Plains of the United States installations have to survive
winter’s freezing conditions as well as higher sheer winds produced
from tornados.
Robotic systems mimic their hard automation counterparts and are adapted
to the large positioning structures with booms and transporter manipulators
to move the robot’s torch near the work area. See Robot
Mounted on Boom Manipulator. Intelligent robotic sensors such as
through-arc joint tracking or vision guidance are often required due to the
inconsistent shape of the parts and the large weld joint configurations. Robots
with multiple axes provide for additional servomotors integrated with the
manipulator and turning rolls. The integration of servomotors allows all axes
to coordinate together to provide a greater working space for the robot and
to turn the parts into the correct position for welding.
Challenges can exist for the control and safety configurations of the
robotic systems. Robot software-based dual check safety provides a safe mechanism
to limit the robot’s working area to the weld locations, providing even
greater flexibility for operators to work alongside intelligent robots completing
pre- and postprocess preparations. Dual check safety is the most up-to-date
technology and has been employed on hundreds of robots. It is more cost effective
and flexible than large fenced-in safety enclosures that limit the robots’
working area. This technology enables the operator and robot to safely coexist
in the welding environment.
Tower Design
Designed with three-dimensional computer- aided design (CAD) and simulation
programs, tower columns must meet structural requirements. 3-D design programs
allow for exporting of the geometric data, utilized for finite element analysis
as well as direct robot programming. Once the design criteria for a particular
weld is established, the geometry and weld path are downloaded to the robot’s
simulation environment (virtual robot controller) where reach, accessibility,
and collisions are determined for the particular assembly in the robotic welding
system.
Wind tower sections tend to be modular in design and therefore lend
themselves to robotic off-line programming. Robot programs and weld paths
can be quickly adjusted to another tower section. The robotic off-line programming
environment enables the virtual robot controller to develop the perfect work
and travel angles. By placing the PC cursor on the weld joint, the virtual
robot controller can determine the perfect work and travel angles for the
weld and then download the information to the robot. This saves the operator
from needing to be 6 m above the shop floor to program the robot. Intelligent
robot sensors like through-arc joint tracking can then adapt these perfect
robotic weld programs to the imperfect weld joint on the conical section.
Joint tracking adapts the weld position based on the current feedback while
weaving, achieving appropriate fill based on the variable weld joint geometry.
Building the Doors
Wind turbines require regular maintenance and manned access to the tower
column and nacelle all accessed through a door near the base. This poses a
design and manufacturing challenge because of the localized stresses in this
area. Ideally, the location should have minimal impact on the structure design,
but the application of the column design does not warrant this. Placing the
door in the lower section eases the maintenance accessibility at the expense
of fabrication complexity. The thickest material of the tower is at the base,
approaching 180 mm in thickness, and is tapered in shape. Thus far, manual
operators have had to cut and weld the door due to the thicker material and
the imperfect shape of this rolled section.
The latest robotic solution is through laser scanning of the shape of
the conical section profile and building the cutting path for the door’s
hole size, shape, and bevel angle. See Automatic Profile
Scan Generates Accurate Cutting and Welding Paths. The robot moves
the laser scanner along a predescribed path and measures the offset at very
minute slices, generating 3-D data of the area for the door. This data virtually
projects the door support ring into the tube and makes robot path adjustments
based on the actual shape. Optimized robot programs automatically cut the
opening, exceeding a manual operator’s skill due to the size and shape
of the parts. Therefore, the hole is custom profiled according to the radius
of the conical tube at the location to be cut and beveled. In addition, weld
sizes are optimized by laser scanning the profile and robotic beveling, taking
into account the tube’s profile shape. Matching the door intersection
to the main column tube provides consistent root openings, reducing material
waste, lower welding cycle time, and improved structural quality.
Steel is selected based on the specific mechanical properties for the
application and then laser cut to a minor banana shape that is rolled into
a taper to form the conical sections of the tower column. Weld areas are prepped
based on the welding process including the bevel angle and root face. The
parts are then arranged for the longitudinal weld by setting the root opening
and then tack welding. Complete penetration is a requirement; the rings are
joined lengthwise from the inside (see Robot Reaching
Inside the Tower Section) and out, and then placed on turning rolls
to position the components in the optimum location for the robot (see Turning Roll for Part Rotation Optimization). Robots
with more than 3 m of reach are typical for these longitudinal welds, and
they produce multipass welding with a single setup. After the long joints
are welded, the conical sections are placed on turning rolls and the same
basic steps mentioned previously for preparation and setup are carried out.
The difference is the turning rolls should be set up so that the smaller diameter
is placed toward the top of the conical section so that it can spin the column
smoothly. Welding multiple smaller cone sections together grows the tower
in length up to the allowable size of the available transporter.
Using Submerged Arc Welding
The submerged arc welding (SAW) process allows for greater deposition
rates, some as high as 45 kg/h, much more than the typical single and twin
GMA welds. The higher deposition rates are attributed to many factors such
as the powdered flux cover to shield the weld and improve current transfer.
Flux is delivered to the weld joint just ahead of the arc and while some is
consumed in the weld process, most of it can be recovered. Other advantages
that improve deposition rates are the ability to run on AC/DC welding machines
where the polarity and current type (AC or DC) are switchable and can be modulated
through variable balance AC current. Twin wires offer an effective improvement
and allow for combinations on the leading and trailing arcs. Modern inverter
welding power supplies increase welding efficiency due to the electronics.
A side benefit is dynamic switching with no requirement to change weld torch
leads based on the output desired as the machine is software controlled. Microprocessors
monitor the welding process through state-of-the-art DSP control and communicate
through networks across an Ethernet port , supporting data collection and
reporting as well as sequence control. One feature that stands out is the
welding network control, which allows direct control and sequencing through
another computer or motion planning device. Robot controllers synchronize
the welding machine and offer improved capabilities such as through-arc joint
tracking and remote control and data monitor and collection. The new SAW power
supplies with these capabilities opens up improved performance and higher
throughput with intelligent welding control from the robot.
Submerged arc welding applied to a robot is a relatively new development
in the industry and is equally capable for long continuous joints that require
high deposition rates. The modern intelligent inverter power supply more readily
connects to the robot controller and offers new application with SAW. Applying
robotic SAW to the wind tower is a win-win as the robot can manipulate many
more degrees of freedom than a typical mechanized transporter, improving the
capabilities for many more applications on the tower. The robot has the capability
to adapt to the weld location based on the welding current feedback signal
providing a sense of direction to lead the arc into the weld joint. Robot
controls handle multiple welding torches with ease, such as twin wire, so
the operator can simply select the lead wire based on the weld direction and
the appropriate through-arc joint tracking sensor function. The robot manipulates
the SAW process, welding the door’s curved profile while coordinating
the turning rolls. Robotic coordinated motion provides 1G orientation, which
is difficult for mechanized hard automation systems
Normal production methods rely on cutting or shaving the weld to save
weight and reduce propagation of stress risers. Operating a manual weld shaver
is heavy work and with the long welds on the tower column, it becomes a time-consuming
process. Robots have utilized machining equipment with specialized force control
to manage the bead profile, reducing it to a smooth transition from each side
of the weld. Weld sizes such as a 45-mm butt joint are routinely shaved by
the robot. These automated weld shavers provide force feedback to the robot
control so that appropriate material is removed with each pass. A force of
35 kg is applied to the work while the robotic auxiliary servomotor controls
the velocity of the slot-milled cutting tool, cleanly and quickly removing
the weld bead convex shape. Robots can remove this type of material at speeds
of 10 to 12 mm/s providing continuous performance, making the robotic controlled
weld shaver a necessity for wind tower production.
Testing the Welds
Nondestructive examinations such as ultrasonic testing (UT) are normally
carried out on all main structure welds of the tower including the longitudinal
weld joints as well as the conical sections and mounting rings. See Robotic Automatic Ultrasonic Weld Inspection.
Typically, this is a tedious process where the scanning head is moved along
each weld by an operator. Robotic automation provides the capability to handle
the UT sensor with greater precision and allow it to accurately travel along
the welds at greater distances than possible with manual scanning. The interface
is simple and the robot’s accurate speeds provide excellent data feedback
for the monitoring and validation of each weld, maintaining high quality standards
and records for liability.
The large size of the parts places the robot and the welding torch far
from the operator’s view. Remote control is available on robots to allow
for setup, operation, programming, and monitoring the weld. Remote access
through the robot’s teach pendant is achieved through standard PC office
tools such as a Web browser, which lowers the cost of monitoring and control.
Welding equipment settings and systems functions like the flux hopper control
can be set and adjusted from the PC. Optional viewing cameras can be integrated
through the remote PC for viewing the actual robot system, closing the loop
for the operator.
Worldwide energy demands have been increasing at rates that will require
developments of alternative sources in a larger scale. Wind energy appears
to be an immediate technology offering lower risks because of the leveraged
global installed base and experience. Manufacturing large wind generators
utilizes much of the technology that has been developed over the years, including
robotic automation. Many factories are already applying robotic automation
for tower manufacturing, but some still utilize a manual method for production,
and accrue higher production costs. Large volumes of wind towers are required
to meet the energy demands of tomorrow and the taller, more efficient sizes
are becoming commonplace, so manufacturers will have to adopt robotic automation
to be competitive. Improved production volumes and robotic automation will
likely lower the overall cost of manufacturing and therefore the kWh for energy
produced. Most of the discussions to date have been tailored around developed
nations, but if the costs can be lower, then developing countries may be able
to take advantage of the clean energy provided by wind generators. Even future
applications like wind to hydrogen become more viable when the cost to produce
the equipment is reduced, making these storage technologies more practical.
Wind power generation can provide cost-effective energy with short-term
payback but robotic automation of wind tower generators can make this an even
shorter payback through improved efficiencies. Robots are extremely powerful
and flexible and well suited for wind tower manufacturing.
Let
us send you more information. Click here to
be contacted by a FANUC Robotics representative.
This article was republished in its entirety in the Welding Journal,
August 2009.